2013年7月22日 · Lever machines were on the cutting edge of technology, with more moving parts than almost anything else being made. As such, they were as much of a high-tech solution to the problem of running an honest election as computer tabulated punched-cards in the 1960’s or direct-recording electronic voting machines in the 1990’s.”

The pre-election programming of Sequoia’s AVC Edge [a model of electronic voting machine] is conducted at the election headquarters and secured inside the physical hardware of the machine before it is sent to a polling place. The AVC Edge also stores all election data, including ballot definition, in redundant memory.

July 29, 2017 – First-Ever Voting Machine “Hackathon” Reveals Many Vulnerabilities in Electronic Voting Machines and Poll Systems Posted on August 3, 2017 by “E-voting machines and voter registration systems used widely in the United States and other countries’ elections can readily be hacked—in some cases with less than two hours ...

“Reports from electronic voting machine vendors and media coverage today indicate that electronic voting machines are recording Americans’ votes efficiently and effectively. Media reports are focused primarily on long lines and other problems related to high voter turnout. Electronic voting machine issues that have been cited are related to human error, process …

2013年7月22日 · Computer security expert Dr. Edward Felten, with the help of graduate students Ariel Feldman and J. Alex Halderman, demonstrates that with less than a minute of physical access to a Diebold electronic voting machine or its PCMCIA memory card, an attacker could install malware that could steal votes while modifying all records, logs, and ...

First-Ever Voting Machine “Hackathon” Reveals Many Vulnerabilities in Electronic Voting Machines and Poll Systems 8/17/2017 - During the July DEFCON hacking conference in Las Vegas, at least 18 new vulnerabilities were found in electronic voting machines and …

The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), in a July 19, 2004 letter to Henry McMaster, Attorney General for the State of South Carolina, outline some examples of electronic voting machines not accurately capturing the intent of the voter:

“It is not sufficient for electronic voting systems to merely anonymize the voting process from the perspective of the voting machine. Every time a ballot is cast, the voting system adds an entry to one or more software or firmware logs that consists …

The eSlate voting unit has been uniquely engineered for maximum voter independence and accessibility. The eSlate allows all voters, including voters with physical disabilities, to vote using the same system. Simply designed, the voter uses a wheel to highlight choices, and a button to mark those choices on the electronic ballot.

Alfred DuPlessis, an electronic systems reliability engineer, offered the following definitions in a Dec. 2, 2002 email to the Institute for Electrical and Electronic Engineers (IEEE) Project 1583 Voting Machine Reliability Task Group (available at the IEEE Project 1583 website):