Appeal to consequences, also known as argumentum ad consequentiam (Latin for "argument to the consequence"), is an argument that concludes a hypothesis (typically a belief) to be either true or false based on whether the premise leads to desirable or undesirable consequences. [1]

Oct 24, 2023 · An Appeal to Consequences Fallacy occurs when someone argues that a belief is true or false based on the consequences that will follow if the belief is accepted. In this article, you'll learn everything you need to know about the Appeal to Consequences Fallacy—from its origin and psychological roots to a plethora of real-world examples.

May 23, 2023 · Appeal to consequences is a type of logical fallacy, meaning a flaw in reasoning that weakens an argument or a trick of thought used as a debate tactic. It occurs when the truthfulness of a statement or belief is decided by the consequences it would have.

Aug 28, 2024 · An appeal to consequences (also argumentum ad consequentiam) is a logical fallacy that the perceived outcomes of a proposition can determine its veracity. However, the utility of a belief is independent of its truth-value.

Rhetorical fallacy in which, instead of factual reasons in favour of, or against a position, reference is made to the consequences it would have if a position was true or false. For example: A: There is no evidence for the existence of God.

Appeals to Consequences differ from these cogent forms of argument in the following ways: The argument is not about a plan or policy, but a proposition which therefore has a truth-value. The argument does not concern the truth-value of logical consequences of the proposition, but the good or bad causal consequences of believing it.

The Appeal to Consequences is a type of logical fallacy that occurs when someone argues that a belief must be true or false based on the potential or actual consequences of that belief, rather than on evidence or logical reasoning.

The fallacy of argumentum ad consequentiam (or appeal to consequences) occurs when an arguer uses the desirability (or undesirability) of accepting a statement as evidence of its truth (or falsehood).

Appeal to Consequences argumentum ad consequentiam. Category: Appeals to Motives in Place of Support. Definition: The reader is warned of unacceptable consequences. Examples: You can't agree that evolution is true, because if it were, then we would be no better than monkeys and apes., You must believe in God, for otherwise life would have no ...

The consequences of some idea (good or bad) are irrelevant to the truth or reasonableness of that idea. Notice that the researchers, being convinced of the negative consequences of the study on society, might rationally choose not to publish the …