资讯

Abiola v. Abubakar exemplifies how the quest for justice can transcend national borders when domestic remedies are ...
The suit brought by the Justice Department’s Civil Division against the Maryland Federal District Court judges did not hide the ball.
The Supreme Court decided to lift nationwide blocks ending birthright citizenship, but the case continues in Washington.
The Latino Newsletter on MSN2 天Opinion
Liberty and Justice: Certain Terms and Conditions May Apply
UNITED STATES v. WONG KIM ARK. He was detained aboard steamships for five months while his case moved through the courts. The ...
Legal experts described the move as an attack on judicial independence. The DOJ said its goal was to preserve Trump’s ...
Supreme Court narrows judicial authority on nationwide injunctions while leaving Trump’s birthright citizenship order ...
The Trump administration is challenging Los Angeles’ sanctuary city policies in court, the latest major city to be targeted ...
The suit challenges a May 28 order issued by the district’s chief judge concerning the handling of habeas corpus petitions.
The United States’ Department of State issued this warning in a South African travel advisory on 27 May 2025. Its purpose is to protect the lives and serve the interests of U.S. citizens abroad.
DOJ sues all 15 federal district court judges in Maryland for "egregious example of unlawful judicial overreach." ...
The court’s decision held that lower courts must narrow the scope of their relief, allowing only case-specific rulings instead of blanket nationwide orders.