With that in mind, it is interesting to note what the Supreme Court said about the Office of Special Counsel in Seila Law v CFPB. In concluding that Congress could not protect the head of the ...
Collins v. Yellen, 594 U.S. 220, 256 (2021) (quoting Seila Law LLC v. CFPB, 591 U.S.197, 228 (2020)); see also Trump v. United States, 603 U.S. 593, 621 (2024) ("[T]he President's power to remove ...
In 2019, the Supreme Court had struck down a similarly worded constraint in Seila Law v. CFPB as a separation of powers violation, specifically a clause prohibiting the president from removing the ...
来自MSN26 天
JONATHAN TURLEY: Judge's Special Counsel ruling may be the setback Trump admin was looking forIn 2020, the Court ruled in Seila Law LLC v. CFPB that Congress had violated Article II by granting tenure protection to that sole agency head, writing: "The CFPB’s single-Director structure ...
一些您可能无法访问的结果已被隐去。
显示无法访问的结果