In a pivotal year for college athletics, the industry's future rests over the next few weeks on a retiring judge, a divided ...

The judge will now assess the brief, objections and settlement terms in their entirety before delivering a final ruling on approval.

As college basketball was getting ready to crown a champion Monday night in San Antonio, the final approval hearing for a ...

The settlement of a $2.8 billion federal class-action antitrust lawsuit filed by athletes against the NCAA and the largest ...

On Monday, a California judge conducted a hearing on a settlement that would reshape college sports. Read the developments as ...

A bill that modifies existing Oregon law around student-athletes earning money from their Name, Image and Likeness (NIL) ...

A federal judge declined to make a final ruling on the NCAA’s $2.8 billion House settlement after hearing objections Monday.

HBCUs, like the rest of Division I athletics, will have to deal with new standards with the implementation of the NCAA vs. House Settlement.

Over the next few weeks, the industry’s future rests on decisions from a 75-year-old retiring federal judge to approve the landmark House settlement; a divided congressional membership to ...

The House vs. NCAA settlement has seismic ramifications for the college sport model. The case situates the tension between amateurism, pay-for-play, and name, image, and likeness. The former being ...

LSU gymnast Olivia Dunne appeared during a crucial hearing to raise her objections to the House settlement. Here's what she ...