The peer-review process for psychological research is strained to the breaking point, jeopardizing the efficacy of the ...
For any general questions and comments about the peer-review process, the journal or its editorial policies that are not addressed here, we encourage reviewers to contact us using the feedback ...
It’s an integral part of getting great science into the world. We recognise the important role of our peer reviewers, offering support and recognition to every member of our network. Peer review is ...
What’s the secret to building trust and integrity in research? Peer review gives research credibility. It offers a chance to improve and strengthen publications so every contribution to the scientific ...
Government trial will invest nearly £5 million of taxpayers’ money in AI initiatives to modernise research processes ...
The following outline can be used to track the status of your manuscript. If you currently have a manuscript in peer review, you will see a status message on your Author Dashboard in ScholarOne under ...
One of the concerns that arose from the Patrick case was a fear that no physician would want to participate in peer review if he or she could be potentially liable for a bad report. The HCQIA gave ...
Student peer assessments provide opportunities for classmates to give and receive meaningful feedback, building valuable skills for both reviewers and recipients. Reviewers develop the ability to ...
Join Sonja Krane of ACS Publications and Osvaldo Oliviera of ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces for an interview and audience Q&A session on AI and the impact to the peer review and publishing ...
Suggest potential reviewers Make a decision on the paper without further ... the SME will evaluate the revised manuscript and either request further peer reviews (repeating steps 4–8 above) or make a ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results